<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[Feature Request] Design &gt; Segments – Condition for missing attributes (or segment membership as an alternative)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello,</p>
<p dir="auto">I'd like to request a feature for the Segments configuration under the Design section.</p>
<p dir="auto">Currently, when setting up segment criteria based on player attributes, it seems that a player can only be matched if the attribute actually exists on their profile. However, there is no way to define a condition for players who do NOT have a specific attribute (i.e., the attribute is missing / has never been set).</p>
<p dir="auto">Alternatively, this could also be solved with a segment membership condition — for example, "player is a member of Segment X" or "player is NOT a member of Segment X". With this, I could create a segment of players who have the attribute, and then simply exclude that segment to get the same result as an "attribute does not exist" condition.</p>
<p dir="auto">So either of the following would cover this use case:</p>
<ol>
<li>An operator like "does not exist" (or "is not set") for player attribute conditions</li>
<li>A condition based on segment membership: "is in segment" / "is not in segment"</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">If there is already a workaround for this, please let me know.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.getbraincloud.com/topic/376/feature-request-design-segments-condition-for-missing-attributes-or-segment-membership-as-an-alternative</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 13:31:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.getbraincloud.com/topic/376.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 07:09:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>