• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Solved
  • Unsolved
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
brainCloud Forums

Are there plans to support Storekit 2 receipt verification?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved APIs
16 Posts 7 Posters 549 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LEE JONG GUN
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    https://discussions.unity.com/t/unity-iap-5-0-2-ios-sandbox-same-receipt-returned-for-all-purchases-after-the-first-one/1692048/5

    Due to the issue described in the Unity discussion above, we need StoreKit 2 support on iOS as soon as possible. Please prioritize StoreKit 2 integration

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    noah
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    StoreKit2 needs immediate support.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    peter
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    This is also a major blocker for us. We recently upgraded our laptops, which only support XCode 26. This meant we had to upgrade all of our dependencies, which forced us to migrate to Unity IAP v5 - so it's currently not possible for us to roll back to Unity IAP 4 (and therefore storekit 1).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    JasonL bitHeads
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    Confirmed, StoreKit2 support is included in the upcoming v5.9 release, scheduled for next week.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    peter
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    Thanks for the update!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Paul WinterhalderP Offline
    Paul WinterhalderP Offline
    Paul Winterhalder brainCloudAdmin
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    Hi folks,

    brainCloud 5.9 is now live - with StoreKit2 support. Go to it!

    Paul.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LEE JONG GUN
    replied to Paul Winterhalder last edited by
    #11

    @Paul-Winterhalder Hello, is there guide for this menu?
    스크린샷 2026-01-13 오전 9.02.21.png

    and what is "Use App Store Server API for legacy receipts (optional)"?

    Michael CostaM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Michael CostaM Online
    Michael CostaM Online
    Michael Costa
    replied to LEE JONG GUN last edited by Michael Costa
    #12

    Hello @LEE-JONG-GUN!

    In order to fill out these values, you will first need to go your app on App Store Connect, then go to App Information. Under General Information you will see the app's Apple ID (this number should also appear in the URL for your app, FYI).

    Next you will need to go to the Users and Access > Integrations > In-App Purchases page in App Store Connect.

    From there you can find the Issuer ID. Next you'll want to click on the + button to Generate In-App Purchase Key. Give it whatever name you think suitable and it should add it to the page. You will then need to download this IAP subscription key; this should reveal the Key ID for that subscription.

    The downloaded IAP subscription key file should be in a .p8 file format. You can open it with a text editor in order to view the Encoded Key. Ctrl + A then Ctrl + C to copy the entire file to the Encoded Key field. Also keep this file somewhere safe, you can only download it once!

    That should be all that's required in order to make use of brainCloud's StoreKit 2 integration 😁 .

    Finally the option for Use App Store Server API for legacy receipts (optional) is there to have apps with older integrations of the brainCloud client to make use of the new implementation with the old StoreKit 1 receipt system.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    peter
    wrote last edited by peter
    #13

    I have tried following the instruction (triple checked I have found and copied the correct fields) but I keep getting a "Itunes Inapp Integration fields incomplete" error when I try to save the page.

    I am supplying:
    App id > id shown in general information
    Issuer id > Copied from in-app purchasing integrations page
    Key ID > Copied form in-app purchasing integrations page (for the specific key)
    Encoded key: Contents of the p8 file

    The copied error message

    ---- CONTEXT ----
    
    {
      "email": "redacted@redacted.com",
      "teamId": "redacted",
      "accountNumber": "redacted",
      "appId": "xxxx",
      "appName": "Redacted",
      "profileId": null,
      "page_path": "/",
      "page_search": "",
      "page_hash": "#/app/design/core-app-info/application-ids",
      "page_location": "https://portalx.braincloudservers.com/#/app/design/core-app-info/application-ids"
    }
    
    ---- DETAILS ----
    
    {
      "errorCode": 2020000,
      "errorMessage": "Itunes Inapp Integration fields incomplete",
      "reasonCode": 40660
    }
    
    Michael CostaM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Michael CostaM Online
    Michael CostaM Online
    Michael Costa
    replied to peter last edited by
    #14

    Hello @peter. Thank you for letting us know, we are currently looking into it.

    As a work around, if you ENABLE "Use App Store Server API for legacy receipts (optional)", and the other fields are filled, you should be able to save. Afterwards you can DISABLE the optional value and it will still be able to save.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    peter
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    Thank you for the advice, we have now managed update our Application IDs.

    However:

    • We always get a 101 Transaction id not found failure from Brain Cloud when attempting to verify an in-app purchase.
    • When Use App Store Server API for legacy receipts is checked, we also get a 101 failure when testing with older builds that use Brain Cloud 5.8 client and StoreKit1.
      • However, if we uncheck this, older builds transactions succeed as expected.

    Given the fact we see the same behaviour on legacy transactions, I suspect this may be a fault on your side? If not, is there anything further I can do to investigate?

    Notes on retrieving a transaction id with Unity.

    We are using Unity IAP 5.1.2, it can be a bit confusing to find out where to retrieve the TransactionID, and not the OriginalTransactionID - as requested by the BrainCloud docs. (Though in my initial testing shows these ids are often the the same).

    Initially I parsed transactionID from the jws returned from the app store (a convoluted process), I then realised PendingOrder.Info.Receipt returns a json string which has TransactionID as one of it's fields.

    The data we submit to VerifyPurchase() looks something like this:

    {"excludeOldTransactions":false,"transactionId":"2000001103879447"}
    
    Michael CostaM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Michael CostaM Online
    Michael CostaM Online
    Michael Costa
    replied to peter last edited by
    #16

    Hello @peter.

    That's correct, you get the TransactionID from deserializing PendingOrder.Info.Receipt (at least that is the method I'm using 😅). The reason why you want the TransactionID and NOT the OriginalTransactionID is because renewed subscription purchases will have two different values for this.

    Just a couple questions so we have more context:

    1. Do you have the Bundle Id field filled on the Apple Platforms page on brainCloud? This is still a requirement for validating purchases. You'll need to make sure to have one set up for your app on Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles and that it matches the Bundle Identifier in your Unity Player Settings.

    2. Are you running CachePurchasePayloadContext() (docs) before VerifyPurchase()? This is also a requirement for purchases of itunes type.

    Please let me know so we can look deeper into this! Thanks 😄

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Solved
  • Unsolved
  • Users